Miguna Endorses Uhuru After Unveiling New Book

And that is not the only thing. Miguna today has made very sensational and actionable claims. These are some of the allegation he made at his press conference earlier today.

Miguna goes further to assert Raila Odinga is a much heavier drinker than Uhuru Kenyatta, and that Raila personally approved the idea of fundraising and arming ODM youth in meetings Miguna sat at. I am not sure if Ruto, Ngilu and Balala agree with those allegations. Miguna goes on to boast ..”I know some people in ODM actually mobilized,fundraised and purchased weapons for self-defence”, he said, and “not withstanding the denials by ODM, they conceived,devised and executed a 41 against 1 in 2007”.

Miguna also alleged that the ICC Prosecutor ignored his plea to submit new evidence against Raila Odinga saying that ICC are only interested in evidence implicating the the four suspects they already have charged.

Miguna also outrageously claimed that Chief Justice Willy Mutunga wrote an email to Miguna advising him on how PM Raila Odinga should react to ‘illegal’ judicial appointments of CJ, DPP and AG. Miguna claims the Chief Justice as as late 2011 sending revealing emails emphasizing on the need to destroy anyone perceived to be outside Raila inner circle.

According to Miguna, ODM insiders Adams Oloo and Jerry Okungu concoct opinion poll figures for Infortrak Research which has persistently projected Raila as the front runner in presidential polls. Angela Ambitho father was Jaramogi Lieutenant according to Miguna (Angela is Infotrak MD).

Miguna also confirmed having met and interviewed the person who helped Raila steal Molasses plant and that Raila also demanded a Ksh 2million bribe from Hon Najib Balala so as to make him the ODM Mombasa COunty Branch Chair ahead of perennial rival Ali Hassan Joho.

I have not bought the book and have no intentions of buying it. The timing of the book, written in a record three months, the contents, and the fact it is retailing much less cost than his first book, raises many questions about the motive of Miguna Miguna.

Media Briefing by New ICC Prosecutor During Her First Visit to Kenya

Statement by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Mrs. Fatou Bensouda

Thank you for being here for this early afternoon briefing. I wanted to start the programme of this my first official visit to Kenya as ICC Prosecutor by meeting with you and introducing myself. Let me also briefly outline for you why I am here and what I intend to do. Then I will be pleased to answer a few questions from the floor.

As you may be aware, I was nominated and supported by the African Union as the sole African candidate for the position of ICC Prosecutor, to which I was unanimously elected by the 121 States Parties on 12 December 2011. I am deeply indebted to the AU and African leaders including President Kibaki, for their confidence in me. Their support is yet another example of Africa’s commitment to international justice and their desire to end impunity. For the next nine years, I have the privilege, honour and the responsibility to serve as Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Having been nominated and supported for this position by the AU, I consider myself to be a mere extension of the African fabric for ending impunity. In carrying out the mandate given to me by the 121 States Parties, I am guided by the law and the cardinal principles of independence, impartiality and fairness.

My mandate is to investigate and prosecute those most responsible for the world’s gravest crimes, where no-one else is doing justice for the victims. Our purpose, my purpose, is to seek the truth. By doing so, by bringing justice, we can provide some solace to survivors, restore dignity to shattered lives and the memory of those who were killed. We do this with utter respect. Respect for the primary responsibility of national judicial systems to carry out genuine national proceedings against those alleged to have committed crimes, respect for the rights of the accused and above all, respect for victims, all as mandated in the Rome Statute.

Kenyan victims, the women, men and children who suffered during the dark days of 2007-2008 are my priority, my daily motivation. They always have been and they always will be.

I arrived in Kenya yesterday and plan to be here for the coming week. While here, I plan to meet with key government figures, notably President Kibaki and Prime Minister Odinga.

You will recall that on 3 July 2009 my predecessor met with a high level delegation of Kenyan government officials in The Hague. Agreement was reached with the representatives of the Kenyan government that should the Kenyan authorities carry out genuine judicial proceedings against those most responsible for PEV, the Office of the Prosecutor would have no ground to intervene. My predecessor and the Kenyan delegation agreed that impunity was not an option.

On 5 November 2009, after being informed by the Kenyan authorities of the unfortunate gridlock at the national level, my predecessor met with President Mwai Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga in Nairobi. He informed them that since all the statutory criteria were fulfilled, and since the Government of Kenya had been unable to reach agreement on the establishment of a local tribunal to deal with PEV crimes, it was his duty to open an investigation into the alleged crimes.

Accordingly, he requested the cooperation of Kenyan national authorities with the Court. He recalled the complementary roles of the ICC and the Kenyan authorities in combating impunity. The President and Prime Minister issued a joint statement in which they recorded their constructive meeting with the Prosecutor. The Government stated that it remained fully committed to cooperating with the ICC within the framework of the Rome Statute and the Kenyan International Crimes Act.

This continues to be the framework of the interaction between the Court and Kenya. During my stay in Kenya, I plan to meet with the people of Kenya, civil society and the diplomatic community, to thank them for the critical support they have provided and continue to provide for the work of the Office.

I am here to listen. Through a number of public and media events in the Rift Valley, I plan to exchange views with ordinary Kenyans, including with victims groups regarding ICC process.

The Judges of the ICC have agreed that four suspects must face justice for crimes they allegedly committed during the PEV. The ICC Judges have agreed there are substantial grounds to believe that the four suspects committed the crimes they are charged with and that the cases should go to trial. The four are presumed innocent until proven guilty and the burden of proof is on my Office to prove the cases against them beyond reasonable doubt. Let me stress this: the people of Kenya are not on trial; the Government of Kenya is not on trial and no ethnic community is on trial before the ICC. The allegations concern individual criminal responsibility. The four accused will have a fair trial and an equal opportunity to refute the allegations. Their guilt or innocence will be established by the Judges at the conclusion of these trials.

Based on their calendar and their workload, the judges have set the start of the trials for April next year. My Office is working at full speed to prepare for the start of the trials and the process of disclosure has already begun.

As with any judicial process we face challenges. We are working hard every day to address efforts to interfere with our witnesses and our evidence. We are also working to resolve delays in the execution of our requests by the Government of Kenya.

The political future of Kenya is in the hands of Kenyans themselves. The people of Kenya will decide on the outcome of the upcoming elections and ultimately, they will shape the future of this great country. The ICC judicial process will also take its own course irrespective of the political choices that the people of Kenya.

Nairobi Serena Hotel, Amani Room.
22 October 2012

PS: ICC Prosecutor Bensouda will hold a further press conference on the afternoon of Thursday 25 October at the conclusion of the Nairobi segment of her visit to Kenya. More details to follow.

Kenyan PEV Victims Saddened by Anyah’s Sudden Departure

As a victim of Kenya’s post election violence in 2008, I have to submit that I am saddened to learn that Morris Anyah has reportedly quit his position as the lawyer representing 229 Kenyan victims at  the International Criminal Court at the Hague amid protest over the trial judges’  decision to limit victim representation at the trial.

The ICC has since formally invited Expressions of Interest for Common legal representatives for victims in the Kenya cases.

Anyah impressed Kenyans who were following the hearings on TV with his solid and eloquent court-room performance during The Prosecutor v. Francis Karimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta and Mohammed Hussein Ali at the pre-trial hearings. Anyah meticulously cross-examined the accussed and their witnesses, and was clearly heads and shoulders above reputable lawyers representing the accused .

The victims in the case against Uhuru Kenyatta and Francis Muthaura are represented by Morris Anyah while those in the case against William Ruto and Joshua arap Sang are represented by Ms Sureta Chana, both of whom were given the go-ahead to continue their representation by the Appeals Chamber in April 2012  following some internal budgetary constraints. Benard Orinda Ndege, who lost 11 family members in an arson attack in Naivasha during the post-election violence, and Maurice Opondo, who lost his hands in Juja, had expressed their confidence in being represented by Anyah and had petitioned the ICC to retain him as their lawyer.

It is not the first time Anyah is being reported as having quit his position. In March this year, it was reported in sections of Kenyan press that Anyah was no longer the victims lawyer a claim that was later found to be incorrect.

In October last year, Anyah generated a lot of political heat locally when he was accused of having visited Kenya and met Lands Minister James Orengo and Miguna Miguna at the Norfolk Hotel in Nairobi. PNU activists were unhappy with Anyah for arranging clandestine meetings with ODM counterparts behind their backs.

Morris Anyah is a Nigeria-American trial lawyer with an international reputation for excellence. He specializes in complex criminal cases and has served as trial or appeals counsel in several high-profile cases before international and national courts.Anyah was earlier this year appointed as Assigned Appeals Counsel to conduct the appeal of convicted former Liberian President Charles Taylor. Mr. Anyah has served as co-counsel on the Taylor Defence team since 2007.